

24th European Congress of Psychiatry / European Psychiatry 33S (2016) S349–S805
S383
EV102
Causes of psychoactive substance use
by cannabis users with schizophrenia
K. Simonienko
1 ,∗
, M. Kwiatkowski
1, U. Cwalina
2, N. Wygnal
1,
K. Wilczynska
1, B. Konarzewska
1, N. Waszkiewicz
11
Medical University of Bialystok, Department of Psychiatry,
Bialystok, Poland
2
Medical University of Bialystok, Department of Statistics and
Medical Informatics, Bialystok, Poland
∗
Corresponding author.
Introduction
Psychoactive substance use (PSU) in patients with
schizophrenia can affect the course of the disease and causes
many side effects. There is no clear evidence whether cannabis
use can trigger the first episode of schizophrenia. The main causes
of cannabis use in patients with schizophrenia are also still not
defined.
Objectives
Determine causes of PSU in cannabis users with
schizophrenia.
Aims
The aim of this study was to find out the causes of PSU in
patients with schizophrenia.
Methods
Thirty-five cannabis users with schizophrenia (28
males, 7 females) were asked to complete 15-item question-
naire about the reasons of psychoactive substance intake. Eighteen
of them used also stimulants. Additional information if PSU or
schizophrenia occurred first was also taken.
Results
The results indicated that regardless of stimulants use
PSU occurred before schizophrenia in 83% of patients. Main rea-
sons of substance intake were: need for relaxation (86%) which
was more often in marihuana group (100%) than in marihuana
and stimulants group (73.7%) and this difference was statistically
significant (
P
= 0.049), curiosity (80%), self-regulation of well-being
(74%), shyness, need for altered states of consciousness, expectation
that psychoactive substances could help them in problem solving,
relationships and sleep disorders (49–54%).
Conclusions
PSU usually occur before the first episode of
schizophrenia. Anxiety, curiosity and looking for unprofessional
help are the most common reasons. The results may indicate an
increased need of psychoeducation and social support in many
areas of life. Future research should be considered.
Disclosure of interest
The authors have not supplied their decla-
ration of competing interest.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.01.1087EV103
The relationship between dimensions
of impulsivity and alcohol
consumption in heavy drinkers
S.Y. Sohn
1 ,∗
, S. Kim
1, S.Y. Lee
2 , 21
Yonsei University College of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and
Institute of Behavioral Science in Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea
2
Dankook University College of Medicine- Cheil General Hospital &
Women’s healthcare center, Psychiatry, Seoul, Republic of Korea
∗
Corresponding author.
Introduction
Impulsivity has been studied as underlying mech-
anism among addictive disorders such as alcohol use disorder.
Several authors have suggested that impulsivity is not a unitary
construct and consist of several subconstructs such as response
inhibition, risk taking.
Objectives
This study conceptualized impulsivity as a multidi-
mensional construct and those subconstucts of impulsivity can
predict alcohol use differentially.
Aims
Our aim was to identify the specific component of impul-
sivity that explained the greatest variance in heavy and problem
drinking among a sample of alcohol use disorder.
Methods
Participants with alcohol use disorder (
n
= 170) com-
pleted a behavioral test battery comprising response inhibition
tasks (Stop signal task), the Balloon Analogue Risk Task (BART)
as measures of subconstruct of impulsivity. Participants also com-
pleted the UPPSP as a measure of general impulsivity.
Results
In a multiple regression model, impulsivity measured by
UPPSP and risk-taking was identified as the measures that pre-
dicted alcohol use and problems.
Conclusions
Results suggest that among patientswith alcohol use
disorder, a behavioral measure of risk-taking predicts alcohol con-
sumption and alcohol problems, even when individual differences
in trait impulsivity are statistically controlled. However, behavioral
measures of response inhibition do not predict unique variance in
alcohol use in patients with alcohol use disorders.
Disclosure of interest
The authors have not supplied their decla-
ration of competing interest.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.01.1088EV104
Problem-solving appraisal as
mediator, moderator and predictor of
smoking-abstinence effects
A. Soliman
Qatar University, Social Sciences, Doha, Qatar
Introduction
There are extensive investigations explaining smok-
ing abstinence effect, yet little is known about the cognitive and
metacognitive mechanisms that underlie the severity of smoking
abstinence effects. Several studies reported that that problem-
solving appraisal is associated with psychological maladaptive
behaviors, such as depression, anxiety.
Objectives
Examining the role of problem-solving appraisal as
mediator, moderator and/or predictor of the severity of withdrawal
symptoms and probably relapse.
Aims
Studying the role of problem-solving appraisal in the sever-
ity of smoking abstinence withdrawal symptoms.
Methods
The present study utilized a two-group pretest and
posttest design to examine the mediating, moderating and pre-
dicting role of problem-appraisal of smoking-abstinence effects. A
total of 92 adult men smokers were administered the problem-
solving inventory (PSI-Ar) as well as several self-report measures
of most reported smoking abstinence effects (pre-test), and then
were asked to stop smoking for 48 h and administered again the
same measures except the PSI-Ar (post-test).
Results
The results revealed that problem-solving appraisal acts
as a possible mediator and predictor but not moderator of the
severity of smoking-abstinence effects. The individuals with who
appraised themselves as ineffective problem solvers have shown
more sever abstinence effects i.e. somatization, depression, general
anxiety, panic, mood states, smoking urges, insomnia and habitual
sleep duration.
Conclusions
Problem-solving appraisal plays a key role in sever-
ity of smoking-abstinence effects by means of mediating the
relationship between abstinence effects before and after smok-
ing abstinence. The findings are discussed in the context of future
research and possible intervention recommendations.
Keywords
Appraisal; Problem-solving appraisal;
Problem-solving inventory; PSI-Ar; Smoking abstinence effects
Disclosure of interest
The author has not supplied his declaration
of competing interest.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.01.1089