

S160
24th European Congress of Psychiatry / European Psychiatry 33S (2016) S116–S348
of effects between eating pathology and depression. A second aim
was to use meta-regression to account for heterogeneity in terms
of study-level effect modifiers.
Results
Meta-analysis results on 30 eligible studies showed that
eating pathology was a risk factor for depression (
r
m
= 0.13, 95% CI:
0.09 to 0.17,
P
< 0.001), and that depression was a risk factor for
eating pathology (
r
m
= 0.16, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.22,
P
< 0.001). Meta-
regression analyses showed that these effects were significantly
stronger for studies that operationalized eating pathology as an eat-
ing disorder diagnosis versus eating pathology symptoms (
P
< 0.05),
and for studies that operationalized the respective outcome mea-
sure as a categorical variable (e.g., a diagnosis of a disorder or where
symptoms were “present”/“absent”) versus a continuous measure
(
P
< 0.01). Results also showed that in relation to eating pathology
type, the effect of an eating disorder diagnosis (
b
=
−
0.06,
t
=
−
7.304,
P
≤
0.001) and bulimic symptoms (
b
=
−
0.006,
t
=
−
2.388,
P
< 0.05)
on depression was significantly stronger for younger participants.
Conclusions
Eating pathology and depression are concurrent risk
factors for each other, suggesting that future researchwould benefit
from identifying factors that are etiological to the development of
both constructs.
Disclosure of interest
The authors have not supplied their decla-
ration of competing interest.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.01.246EW129
The personality dimensions,
depression and tobacco smoking
among detoxified male alcoholics
G. Mandic-Gajic
∗
, A. Eror , G. Dedic , Z. Stojanovic , M. Dolic ,
D. Jokovic , Z. Spiric
Military Medical Academy, Psychiatry, Belgrade, Serbia
∗
Corresponding author.
Introduction
The co-occurrence of tobacco smoking and depres-
sion among alcoholics is frequent and uncertain. Some findings
suggest that there are some shared aethiological factors, but a few
clinical researches of personality dimensions among patients with
these comorbidities were done.
Objectives
The differences of personality dimensions, the pattern
of cigarette use and depression between inpatient alcoholics and
healthy subjects were explored.
Methods
The one hundred primary male inpatient alcoholics
were consecutively recruited. Eighty-six completed study and
were compared with thirty male age matched healthy subjects.
Semistructured clinical interview for sociodemographics and the
pattern of cigarette and alcohol use data was applied. The depres-
sion was assessed by HAMD scale (Hamilton, 1960). The Eysenck
personality questionnaire EPQ was completed. Student
t
-test for
differences and Pearson test for correlation were used.
Results
There were no significant sociodemographic differences
between groups. Alcoholics smoked significantly more frequently
than healthy subjects (86% vs. 50%) and had average mild depres-
sion degree after detoxification. The HAMD score for alcoholics vs.
controls was 15.37
±
6.20 vs. 1.43
±
1.55 respectively. All personal-
ity dimensions did not show differences between groups, except
neuroticism. The neuroticisn showed significantly higher level
among alcoholics vs. controls (12.72
±
5.19 vs. 5.00
±
3.36). The
depression significantly correlated onlywithneuroticism(
r
= 0.487,
P
< 0.001).
Conclusions
The majority of detoxified alcoholics were smokers
with mild depression and higher neuroticism compared to con-
trols. Our results suggest that the alcoholics with high neuroticism
may experience higher depression and may require more intensive
integrative treatment.
Disclosure of interest
The authors have not supplied their decla-
ration of competing interest.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.01.247EW130
Body image and eating disorders are
common in professional and amateur
athletes using performance and
image-enhancing drugs (pieds).
A cross-sectional study
D. Piacentino
1 ,∗
, L. Longo
1, A. Pavan
2, S. Ferracuti
1, R. Brugnoli
1,
P. Girardi
1, G. Sani
11
Sapienza, University of Rome, NESMOS Neuroscience, Mental
Health, and Sensory Organs Department, Rome, Italy
2
Sapienza, University of Rome, Immunohematology and Transfusion
Medicine, Rome, Italy
∗
Corresponding author.
Introduction
The use of Performance and Image-EnhancingDrugs
(PIEDs) is on the increase and appears to be associated with several
psychopathological disorders, whose prevalence in unclear.
Objectives/Aims
We aimed to evaluate the differences–if any–in
the prevalence of body image disorders (BIDs) and eating disorders
(EDs) in PIEDs users athletes vs. PIEDs nonusers ones.
Methods
We enrolled 84 consecutive professional and amateur
athletes (35.8% females; age range = 18–50), training in several
sports centers in Italy. They underwent structured interviews (SCID
I/SCID II) and completed the Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI)
and the Sick, Control, One, Fat, Food Eating Disorder Screening Test
(SCOFF). Mann-Whitney
U
test and Fisher’s exact test were used for
comparisons.
Results
Of the 84 athletes, 18 (21.4%) used PIEDs. The most com-
mon PIEDs were anabolic androgenic steroids, amphetamine-like
substances, cathinones, ephedrine, and caffeine derivatives (e.g.
guarana). The two groups did not differ in socio-demographic
characteristics, but differed in anamnestic and psychopathological
ones, with PIEDs users athletes being characterized by signifi-
cantly (
P
-values < 0.05) higher physical activity levels, consuming
more coffee, cigarettes, and psychotropic medications (e.g. benzo-
diazepines) per day, presenting more SCID diagnoses of psychiatric
disorders, especially Substance Use Disorders, Eating Disorders,
Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD), and General Anxiety Disorders,
showing higher BICI scores, which indicate a higher risk of BDD,
and higher SCOFF scores, which suggest a higher risk of BIDs and
EDs.
Conclusions
In PIEDs users athletes body image and eating disor-
ders, and more in general psychopathological disorders, are more
common than in PIEDs nonusers athletes.
Disclosure of interest
The authors have not supplied their decla-
ration of competing interest.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.01.248EW131
Comorbidity between delusional
disorder and sensory deficits. Results
from the deliranda case register
A. Porras Segovia
1 ,∗
, M. Guerrero Jimenez
2,
C. Carrillo de Albornoz Calahorro
2, J. Cervilla Ballesteros
11
Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, UGC Salud Mental, Granada,
Spain
2
Hospital Santa Ana, Unidad de Salud Mental, Motril, Spain
∗
Corresponding author.
Introduction
Sensory deficits such as blindness and deafness are
very common forms of disability, affecting over 300 million peo-
ple worldwide according to World Health Organization estimates.
These conditions can lead to misinterpretations of the environ-
ment, which may contribute to the development of a delusional
disorder in predisposed people.
Objectives
The objective of this study is to establish the preva-
lence of blindness and hearing loss across delusional disorder.