Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  164 / 812 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 164 / 812 Next Page
Page Background

S160

24th European Congress of Psychiatry / European Psychiatry 33S (2016) S116–S348

of effects between eating pathology and depression. A second aim

was to use meta-regression to account for heterogeneity in terms

of study-level effect modifiers.

Results

Meta-analysis results on 30 eligible studies showed that

eating pathology was a risk factor for depression (

r

m

= 0.13, 95% CI:

0.09 to 0.17,

P

< 0.001), and that depression was a risk factor for

eating pathology (

r

m

= 0.16, 95% CI: 0.10 to 0.22,

P

< 0.001). Meta-

regression analyses showed that these effects were significantly

stronger for studies that operationalized eating pathology as an eat-

ing disorder diagnosis versus eating pathology symptoms (

P

< 0.05),

and for studies that operationalized the respective outcome mea-

sure as a categorical variable (e.g., a diagnosis of a disorder or where

symptoms were “present”/“absent”) versus a continuous measure

(

P

< 0.01). Results also showed that in relation to eating pathology

type, the effect of an eating disorder diagnosis (

b

=

0.06,

t

=

7.304,

P

0.001) and bulimic symptoms (

b

=

0.006,

t

=

2.388,

P

< 0.05)

on depression was significantly stronger for younger participants.

Conclusions

Eating pathology and depression are concurrent risk

factors for each other, suggesting that future researchwould benefit

from identifying factors that are etiological to the development of

both constructs.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.01.246

EW129

The personality dimensions,

depression and tobacco smoking

among detoxified male alcoholics

G. Mandic-Gajic

, A. Eror , G. Dedic , Z. Stojanovic , M. Dolic ,

D. Jokovic , Z. Spiric

Military Medical Academy, Psychiatry, Belgrade, Serbia

Corresponding author.

Introduction

The co-occurrence of tobacco smoking and depres-

sion among alcoholics is frequent and uncertain. Some findings

suggest that there are some shared aethiological factors, but a few

clinical researches of personality dimensions among patients with

these comorbidities were done.

Objectives

The differences of personality dimensions, the pattern

of cigarette use and depression between inpatient alcoholics and

healthy subjects were explored.

Methods

The one hundred primary male inpatient alcoholics

were consecutively recruited. Eighty-six completed study and

were compared with thirty male age matched healthy subjects.

Semistructured clinical interview for sociodemographics and the

pattern of cigarette and alcohol use data was applied. The depres-

sion was assessed by HAMD scale (Hamilton, 1960). The Eysenck

personality questionnaire EPQ was completed. Student

t

-test for

differences and Pearson test for correlation were used.

Results

There were no significant sociodemographic differences

between groups. Alcoholics smoked significantly more frequently

than healthy subjects (86% vs. 50%) and had average mild depres-

sion degree after detoxification. The HAMD score for alcoholics vs.

controls was 15.37

±

6.20 vs. 1.43

±

1.55 respectively. All personal-

ity dimensions did not show differences between groups, except

neuroticism. The neuroticisn showed significantly higher level

among alcoholics vs. controls (12.72

±

5.19 vs. 5.00

±

3.36). The

depression significantly correlated onlywithneuroticism(

r

= 0.487,

P

< 0.001).

Conclusions

The majority of detoxified alcoholics were smokers

with mild depression and higher neuroticism compared to con-

trols. Our results suggest that the alcoholics with high neuroticism

may experience higher depression and may require more intensive

integrative treatment.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.01.247

EW130

Body image and eating disorders are

common in professional and amateur

athletes using performance and

image-enhancing drugs (pieds).

A cross-sectional study

D. Piacentino

1 ,

, L. Longo

1

, A. Pavan

2

, S. Ferracuti

1

, R. Brugnoli

1

,

P. Girardi

1

, G. Sani

1

1

Sapienza, University of Rome, NESMOS Neuroscience, Mental

Health, and Sensory Organs Department, Rome, Italy

2

Sapienza, University of Rome, Immunohematology and Transfusion

Medicine, Rome, Italy

Corresponding author.

Introduction

The use of Performance and Image-EnhancingDrugs

(PIEDs) is on the increase and appears to be associated with several

psychopathological disorders, whose prevalence in unclear.

Objectives/Aims

We aimed to evaluate the differences–if any–in

the prevalence of body image disorders (BIDs) and eating disorders

(EDs) in PIEDs users athletes vs. PIEDs nonusers ones.

Methods

We enrolled 84 consecutive professional and amateur

athletes (35.8% females; age range = 18–50), training in several

sports centers in Italy. They underwent structured interviews (SCID

I/SCID II) and completed the Body Image Concern Inventory (BICI)

and the Sick, Control, One, Fat, Food Eating Disorder Screening Test

(SCOFF). Mann-Whitney

U

test and Fisher’s exact test were used for

comparisons.

Results

Of the 84 athletes, 18 (21.4%) used PIEDs. The most com-

mon PIEDs were anabolic androgenic steroids, amphetamine-like

substances, cathinones, ephedrine, and caffeine derivatives (e.g.

guarana). The two groups did not differ in socio-demographic

characteristics, but differed in anamnestic and psychopathological

ones, with PIEDs users athletes being characterized by signifi-

cantly (

P

-values < 0.05) higher physical activity levels, consuming

more coffee, cigarettes, and psychotropic medications (e.g. benzo-

diazepines) per day, presenting more SCID diagnoses of psychiatric

disorders, especially Substance Use Disorders, Eating Disorders,

Body Dysmorphic Disorder (BDD), and General Anxiety Disorders,

showing higher BICI scores, which indicate a higher risk of BDD,

and higher SCOFF scores, which suggest a higher risk of BIDs and

EDs.

Conclusions

In PIEDs users athletes body image and eating disor-

ders, and more in general psychopathological disorders, are more

common than in PIEDs nonusers athletes.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.01.248

EW131

Comorbidity between delusional

disorder and sensory deficits. Results

from the deliranda case register

A. Porras Segovia

1 ,

, M. Guerrero Jimenez

2

,

C. Carrillo de Albornoz Calahorro

2

, J. Cervilla Ballesteros

1

1

Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, UGC Salud Mental, Granada,

Spain

2

Hospital Santa Ana, Unidad de Salud Mental, Motril, Spain

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Sensory deficits such as blindness and deafness are

very common forms of disability, affecting over 300 million peo-

ple worldwide according to World Health Organization estimates.

These conditions can lead to misinterpretations of the environ-

ment, which may contribute to the development of a delusional

disorder in predisposed people.

Objectives

The objective of this study is to establish the preva-

lence of blindness and hearing loss across delusional disorder.