Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  558 / 812 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 558 / 812 Next Page
Page Background

S554

24th European Congress of Psychiatry / European Psychiatry 33S (2016) S349–S805

Introduction

Delusional disorder has reached an entity of grow-

ing interest with a prevalence in developed countries between 1

and 4% of the psychiatric consultations.

Objective

To describe various socio-demographic and clinical

variables that characterize patients diagnosed with delusional dis-

order in Andalucía according to DSM-5 criteria.

Methods

Reviewing common medical history digital records.

First, it has been proved whether it complies DSM-5 criteria for

the diagnosis of delusional disorder. Then, there have been differ-

ent epidemiological variables collected: age, sex, family psychiatric

history, and marital status, and employment status, age of onset of

illness, number of years of follow-up by specialized care, the num-

ber of visits to your computer, and number of hospitalizations in a

psychiatric inpatient unit among others.

Of the 1927 patients studied, 1452 met the criteria for diagnosis

of delusional disorder. These patients live in Andalusia and come

to different mental health care units, with an average follow-up

period of 9 years and 1 month.

Results

About half of the sample were women and half men (49%

versus 51%).

Forty-seven percent of the sample are married or have a couple,

and 19% are in active employment.

Thirty-two percent have a family history of psychiatric mental dis-

order written in his digital clinical record.

Seventy-five percent of the sample meets criteria F22, while 25%

are diagnosed as other psychoses.

Conclusion

This is the largest record of cases registered with

delusional disorder to date, in which we describe the biopsychoso-

cial characteristics of this group of patients in the largest Spanish

region.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.01.1624

EV640

Socio-demographic analysis of an

early psychosis intervention

programme

C.M. Carrillo de Albornoz Calahorro

, J.A. Rodrigo Manzano ,

B. Girela Serrano

Hospital Santa Ana, Unidad de Salud Mental, Motril, Granada, Spain

Corresponding author.

Introduction

During the first 5 years of the onset of schizophrenia,

the majority of the clinical and psychosocial deterioration takes

place.

This period of time is critical in terms of diagnosing the illness and

providing effective psychosocial and pharmacological treatment.

Objectives/aims

Knowing the demographic profile of users of an

Early Psychosis Intervention Programmeto adapt the intervention

to their specific needs.

Methods

A descriptive statistical analysis of the records of every

patient on admission program during year 2014 was carried out.

There have been various socio-demographic variables collected

such as: sex, age, initial diagnosis, drug consumption, educational

level, labor situation, referral source and origin.

Results

We found an average age of 26, near the normal curve

between 15 and 35 years distribution.

Eighty percent of our simple were men.

Eighty percent were non-affective psychosis as their initial diagno-

sis.

Abuse toxic in 70%, in all cases cannabis or derivatives.

Education level: 56% primary studies. Thirty percent reached sec-

ondary studies. Fourteen percent higher educational level.

In terms of job-training situation: 30% were working, 40% unem-

ployed and 30% studying.

Sixty-five percent were referred from primary care centers, 20%

from drug abuse centers and 15% from hospitalization units.

Main nationalities were Spanish 65%, 30% were Moroccan, and 5%

other came from other nationalities.

Conclusion

It stresses the importance of intervening on dual

diagnosis, the need for greater coordination with primary care to

improve the detection of cases and the development of the training-

labor area in the recovery process.

It is also necessary to evaluate the different characteristics of immi-

grants included in the program.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.01.1625

EV641

Physicians’ burnout: Can we make a

difference?

C.A. Moreira

, G. Sobreira , J.M. Oliveira , M.A. Aleixo

Centro Hospitalar Psiquiátrico de Lisboa, Psychiatry, Lisbon, Portugal

Corresponding author.

Introduction

Burnout is a commonly observed syndrome in

healthcare workers and it has been defined as a psychological con-

dition involving a continuous exposure to stressful work events

leading to adverse consequences both in physical and mental

health. Persistent pressure can lead to exhaustion, psychological

and/or physical distress and may increase the risk of medical errors

and decrease job satisfaction, which incites early retirement.

Objective

The authors pretend to make a brief review regarding

Physicians’ burnout, its prevention and management.

Aims

To understand and to be capable of dealingwith physicians’

burnout.

Methods

The review was based in papers published on PubMed

using the following terms: “burnout”, “risk factors”, “healthcare

professionals” and “physicians coaching”.

Results

Twenty-five to 60% of physicians report burnout across

all specialties. Changes in the healthcare environment have cre-

ated marked and growing external pressures. Numerous studies

suggest that the difficulty that physicians face with balancing their

personal and professional lives is a major contributor to distress.

To reduce stress at work, one should consider two levels of inter-

vention: the individual and the environmental. Multidisciplinary

actions that include changes in the work environmental factors

along with stress management programs that teach people how

to cope better with stressful events showed promising solutions to

manage burnout.

Discussions/conclusions

Burnout among physicians is a common

and serious issue with potentially devastating personal and pro-

fessional consequences. More interventional research is needed

in order to improve psychological well-being, professional career

enjoyment as well as the quality of care provided to patients.

Disclosure of interest

The authors have not supplied their decla-

ration of competing interest.

http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpsy.2016.01.1626

EV642

Victimization of the mentally ill

A. El-Missiry

Ain Shams University, Neurology & Psychiatry, Cairo, Egypt

Background

Persons with mental disorders living in the commu-

nity are liable for victimization and are considered as a high-risk

group.

Objective

To explore the socio-demographic variables and clin-

ical characteristics related to victimization of patients with

schizophrenia in comparison to their non-victimized counterparts.

Subjects and methods

One hundred patients were recruited from

the inpatient wards and outpatient clinics of the Institute of Psy-

chiatry, Ain Shams University. They were subjected to Structured

Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I diagnosis (clinical version);